From all the furniture objects, the chair may be the primary one. While the majority of other forms (save the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair should be viewed here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to complex types for example the bench or sofa, which should be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously labeled.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as a creative art. The chair is not merely a physical support or an aesthetic piece of art; it historically was an indicator of social hierarchy. Within the old royal courts there were important connotations between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to utilise a stool. Since the recent century, a director’s or manager’s chair has developed an indicator of superior standing, as well as in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a raised platform.
As its furniture construction, the chair can be employed for a variety of different purposes. There are chairs designed to suit man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In the olden days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has developed particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair shapes has perfected to match to differing human desires. From its significant connection with man, the chair appears to its full purpose only when utilised. Though it does not make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers if there are items inside or not, a chair is really seen best and regarded best by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter need each other. Thus the several areas of the chair are given names likened to the limbs of the human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple role of a chair is to support the body, its credit is judged primarily for how completely it fulfills this practical job. Within the creation of the chair, the chair maker is limited for the static regulation and principal measurements. Within these rules, however, the chair builder has great freedom.
The history of the chair is an era of several thousand years. There were societies that had distinctive chair shapes, as seen of the leading endeavour in the spheres of skill and art. From such civilisations, particular mention needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of expert make, were found from tombs. The first of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair has four legs shaped similar to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. In this way a strong triangular construction was crafted. There was apparently no noteworthy difference in the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical citizens. The general difference existed in the level of ornamentation, in the choice of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was manufactured as an easily stored seat for officers. As a camp stool the form existed for much later periods. But the stool then also took on the use of a ceremonial seat, its technical task as a folding stool being forgotten. This can already be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the form of folding stools but aren’t able to be folded as the seats were made out of wood. The plain build of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric held between them, then appeared but some time later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of this kind is the folding stool, made from ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is found not as any ancient fossil still in form but in a trove of pictorial evidence. The better recognised is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of them were shown. These odd legs were considered to have been manufactured with bent wood and were in that case put under extreme pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore very solid and were overtly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek design; quite a few models of seated Romans show chairs of a heavier and which appear to be a slightly less intricately crafted klismos. Both designs, light and heavy, were brought back as part of the Classicist period. The klismos style can be seen in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in particular forms of marked iconicism in Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China cannot be tracked as long as the history of the chair in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full series of images and paintings has been kept, detailing the insides and exteriors of Chinese houses and the kinds of furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are a trove of chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an interesting similarity to images of ancient chairs.
Just as in Egypt, there was two major chair designs in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair was seen both with and without arms though always with a square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to give support to the back. In one type, it has been found, the stiles could be slightly curved above the arms for the purpose of conform to the form of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of a back). All three limbs were mortised into the yoke-like top rail. While the style of the back splat then had a foundation for English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that just to a limited capability stabilise corner joints (as well as being loose in the bargain) signify a design exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. All members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—acknowledging perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have had a plaited bottom. These chairs required the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; for when too much weight is forced on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple over. In patriarchal Chinese households of this epoch armchairs most likely were only for the senior persons in the family, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have been brought to China from the West. It is akin very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a variation in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool in a curved member, which is generally provided with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the resulting effect of these furniture styles is stylized. The manufacture and decoration parts are combined in a style that is all at once naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is a result of the fact that the individual parts do not seem to have been put together by use of either glue or screws, but have been mortised into one another and fixed in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Works of art project a design of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to bring up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a similar board from the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. Thus the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture when traveling which, at the same time, granted the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is displayed in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this style of chair may also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not decided that the form actually was born in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in impressive amounts, as indicated from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of such chairs lined up along a wall. The style asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, as developed in Paris around 1750—conquered most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The design owes the popularity to a combination of relaxation and delicacy. The seat conforms to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed strongly on craftsmanlike methodology in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those use wood of relatively thick measurements; but each member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and finer chairs would be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engraving. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popularised in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content
Recent Comments